Toronto's Great Stork Derby

Charles Millar's Will Included Pranks - One Led to a Baby Race

5 Comments
Join the Conversation
The Great Stork Race - Andrewrp - April 2010
The Great Stork Race - Andrewrp - April 2010
Charles Vance Millar, a successful Toronto lawyer and student of human nature, had a wry sense of humor. His 1926 will kept Canadians amused during the Great Depression.

During his forty-five years of practicing law in Ontario, Charles Millar became an expert in wills. He also became quite wealthy and gained a reputation as a practical joker. So, following his death on October 31, 1926, having never married and with no close relatives, it was no surprise to learn that his will distributed his wealth in a mischievous way.

Millar's Will

Millar left lucrative shares in the Ontario Jockey Club to a judge and minister who were strong opponents of gambling and other shares to a rival of the club. He gave equal shares in a vacation home to three fellow lawyers. The only problem was, although they were all friends of Millar, they intensely disliked each other. He gave shares of the O’Keefe Brewery Company to every Protestant minister and every Orange Lodge in Ontario, all strong supporters of prohibition. The fact that the company was owned by Catholics only added to the discomfort felt by the “heirs”.

Clause 9

However, it was Clause 9 of the will that drew the most interest. By it, Millar left the remainder of his money to the Toronto woman who could produce the most children, certified by registrations under the Vital Statistics Act, in the ten year period following the date of his death. The offer became even more lucrative after some nearly worthless land owned by the lawyer became extremely valuable after it was chosen to be part of the site for the Windsor-Detroit tunnel.

The Baby Race

Thus began the Great Stork Derby or baby race. Soon Toronto and other city newspapers were running front page stories. Contestants, some of whom became close friends, were quickly identified and became overnight celebrities. Staid Ontario papers began covering topics often verboten in the past – birth control, abortion, illegitimate children, and divorce. The legal system became involved. Over the next few years, the courts, including the Canadian Supreme Court, faced many questions regarding the contest. What constituted “Toronto”? Would stillborn children count? Would illegitimate children count? And, most important, was Clause 9 even legal? Eventually, all questions were resolved.

The Great Stork Derby Ends

On October 31, 1936, the contest officially ended in a tie. Four women, Anna Katherine Smith, Kathleen Ellen Nagle, Lucy Alice Timleck, and Isabel Mary Macclean, had nine children each. They were each awarded $125,000 (US $1,500,000 today). Two other women would have also tied but were eliminated. Pauline Clarke had nine children but admitted that one was by a man not her husband. Lillian Kenney had actually had twelve babies, but several had died and she was unable to prove that they were not stillborn. As a consolation prize, each was given $12,500.

Ironically, but perhaps not surprisingly, many of the contestants were among those who could least afford large families, half the contest years occurring while the Great Depression was at its height. Of the four winners, two of the women had husbands who were unemployed and their families were on welfare. The other two had husbands who worked steadily, but at low paying jobs. Pauline Clarke was going through a divorce. Fortunately, at least for the top winners, everything worked out. By all accounts, their money was used wisely with education for their children being a top priority.

In his will, Charles Millar said that he had no one to whom he could leave his money. As it turned out, the attorney with the quirky sense of humor was wrong.

John K. Davis, Lennea Davis (wife)

John K. Davis - John is a retired teacher/librarian and has also been doing freelance writing since the late 1970s. Over this period of time, he has had ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 9+9?

Comments

Dec 7, 2008 3:46 PM
Guest :
he was crazy
Jul 25, 2009 7:37 PM
Guest :
Just finished watching the movie, those poor families caught up in that stupid stork derby were left out in the cold because of minor technecalities, the kinda crap lawyers love. I hope that ass hole Millar is rotting in Hell, and the lawyer that carried out the will.
Aug 23, 2009 8:25 PM
Guest :
I watched a 2001 movie today titled "The Stork Derby", starring Megan Follows as a Toronto Star newspaper reporter who wrote stories about several of the contestants. From what I read in this online description, the movie was fairly accurate, except perhaps for changing some of the names. I had never heard of this event, and found it quite interesting as a piece of our Canadian history.
Feb 23, 2011 12:20 PM
Guest :
Acabo de ver la película, y me pareció excepcional. Es curioso, como alguien deja un testamento y siendo un bromista, después de muerto puede seguirse riendo de quienes caen en el juego. Allí se a demostrado una vez mas, que una mente bien entrenada para bien o para mal; puede manipular cientos y miles de personas. me conmovió ver tantas personas que parecían sumidos en la ignorancia al seguirle el juego al difunto, procreandosen como si fueran ratones; simplemente por ganar la fortuna de alguien que no fue arte ni parte en la familia. Es así como muchos no prevean lo descalabrado del juego y el descontrol de la natalidad, llegando a tener una pesada carga, no ganar y cada día aumentar la miseria.
May 22, 2011 12:19 PM
Guest :
As a granddaughter of one of the recipients of the inheritance from Mr. Millar's will, I find your article loaded with bias against anyone who has large families and propogating the notion that these women were in a breeding race. I find this insulting both to these women and particularly to the innocent children and their families that were made the brunt of what the media exploited for the sake of selling newspapers.
My family ancestry goes back to being in Canada to the 1700's and Large families were the norm to help work the land or replenish the population due to the losses of lives given during the wars. It's amazing to me that during the Great Depression anyone had any money; particularly the size of the Millar estate. It seems only fitting that one so wealthy would have a conscious to start giving back and helping those who were in need.
I suggest you reevaluate what you consider to be success. It is apparent that you equate how much money one has rather than how much character one has to help humanity.
5 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement